Undoubtedly From Outerspace ?

conspiraloons™ are often accused of being 'well into' UFOs

as a conspiraloon™ i should probably set out my stall in regard to this topic, but first, a refresher on what are the words that give form to a corrupted acronym (because not even a dictionary can necessarily be trusted with this one these days - i'm pretty sure their definition has become less conflated and less downright wrong since i last looked, though)...

UFO: stands for Unidentified Flying Object and not for Undoubtedly From Outerspace...that's not to say that a UFO cannot be from outer space, but it is to say that UFO in no way specifies that it is

and i most certainly am 'well into' UFOs

i've had a long standing interest in aviation, despite the awful truth that much of the progress was only facilitated and funded in times of war, aviation is - well, would be if our various states hadn't wanted their ever more effective ways of killing people - an exercise in the appreciation of nature

it is also an excellent study in the evolution of engineering

an interest in aviation is an education in where our military technology has been, where it is now, and where it's going

aviation ultimately - if you follow it through its logical development - explains that gravity is no more powerful than electromagnetism, that the universe isn't 'too light', that there's no need to make up parallel universes and dimensions to account for gravity's lack of function and patch up Einstein's equations with ever more bizarre "ere be monsters" tales of magical sparkly elves

Einstein himself, bravely, honestly, knew and admitted the failings in his own work, one has to ask oneself why is it that despite his own self deprecation that 'science' has taken a master's own flawed work and run with it - is it simply because parallel universes, other dimensions, and quarks that can apparently never be proven to exist are useful devices in the remystification of the universe such that new flat Earth falsehoods may once again reign over us ?

i'm persuaded that it is

the yearning of people to fly - not the warmongers, but those who saw it as more of a spiritual thing, a food for the soul - is a yearning which can if given a chance to develop explain some of the greatest mysteries known, such as electromagnetism's relationship to gravity

gravity keeps things falling, and is a problem to be overcome in order to rise from the ground and stay there, electricity can be used to induce a magnetic field, and a magnetic field can overcome gravity

these are straightforward facts, and i bet if i gave you hundreds of billions of taxpayer's dollars back when that was a lot of money you'd be able to make use of these straightforward facts

it's a good-as-certainty that there are those who have

don't be fooled by the more hokey stuff about antigravity - or electrogravitics - it's not only feasible, but allegedly combat operational

when programmes talk about how 'the disclosure that UFOs are amongst us will pave the way for our understanding of the universe and modes of interstellar travel' they're not kidding, but neither are they being ingenuous - it's just more hidden meanings - the one you're not supposed to connect with, and the one you're supposed to believe in

like so much in human endeavour, aviation technology is a reason for lament, lament for how more spiritual drives end up subverted by the state or other controlling force, that which might have enriched, becomes that which instead subjugates and destroys

it's not that humans are inherently mostly evil by default in my opinion, it is that we have that capacity, and those who seek power let that capacity loose upon those they envy or see as the enemy

it is heartbreaking to be aware that not only has aviation been and continues to be responsible for the murder of almost immeasurable millions during 'elitist's' wars, but it also played its part in the contemporary build up to the day when one bloke, sat on a hill with a laptop, can send an army of self reproducing self intelligent cullbots to cleanse the Earth of any and all who oppose him

that dark future potentiality is not too distant from now if one bears in mind the deeper layers of military technology that are permanently classified in the name of 'defence of the people'

the way the miic/mic [military intelligence industrial complex] works is that if there's technology you are aware of, even if it seems as though it must be the very most cutting edge that could possibly exist, there's more you don't know about, they are masters of disinfo/misinformation, technologies are marketed as failing or 'a long way off' whilst in some massive base some bloke is adding cup holders and vanity mirrors to the working article

they put out ideas that intelligence services are stupid, and that technology doesn't work, for primarily tactical reasons, and secondarily for reasons to do with keeping the people from fearing the directions that the technology they have paid for and are continuing to pay for in the name of the war "against" terror might one day take

UFOs are part of this labyrinthine structure of deceit and confusion

i wouldn't call it a belief, but rather an acceptance of the existence of UFOs - if we take UFO at its actual meaning then i too share with many that particular acceptance, even if my own interpretation may be different to most, i've both seen and heard UFOs and seen one's exhaust trail

i, well my ears, witnessed the flight of a scramjet (possibly an aircraft called Aurora) twice in 2005 - once in Buckinghamshire in the middle of the day during the summer, and another time in Cornwall in the late afternoon during the autumn (a high frequency popping sound @ app 50 to 60hz was my guestimate - but that is from memory, a few years ago now), the first time the sky was clear and all that remained was an exhaust trail that looked like mini mushroom clouds piled on top of each other - what i subsequently learned was referred to as 'donuts on a rope'

oh how i wish i'd been outside looking up into the sky before it flew over - by the time i ran outside, it was gone

the second time i heard it only - i was already outside this time, the weather was bad that day, the funny thing was that the sound seemed to 'bounce' off the top of the sky and back from the top of the clouds to the other horizon and reverberate back and forth - perhaps indicating very high altitude, however high it was, it was in a big big hurry

i've been around enough jets in my time to know when something doesn't sound like a jet turbine with its continuous roar, and this was different, it pulsed, very rapidly - imagine a sped up v1 doodlebug and you're on the right track

Aurora supposedly follows on from where Blackbird left off, and can, at some estimates, crack six to eight thousand miles an hour at sufficient altitude - or more if in sufficiently rarefied air

suppose there's a known lineage from U2 to Blackbird - and on to Aurora, then firstly, the fact that i was able to buy a scientifically detailed book on Aurora suggests that Aurora's successor in the same lineage is already doing what it's thing is (there has been talk of Aurora being able to keep flying on into space - this would allow things to be launched whilst the world looks to the space shuttle and other rocket launches for signs of activity, Blackbird only became widely known about once its replacement was allegedly flying), secondly, it implies that the U2/Blackbird/Aurora programmes are not the only lineage of classified craft about - that's how the mic does its thing, it has layers of technology, the deepest visible layer is not necessarily the deepest layer in existence

although i don't think i have personally witnessed these 'other lineages' first hand, the sheer amount of info to imply their existence (in particular including UFO sightings [unidentified objects rather than undoubtedly outerspace objects]) and the plausibility of electrogravitic science, strongly supports the possibility that they, and 'the truth is out there', just not from up there

i have also seen a UFO, sat out on the roof at two in the morning seventeen or so years ago, watching a tiny twinkling light that might have been a star on my left to the south east on a starlit night, i say might because this object sat perfectly still for perhaps the best part of half an hour, may have even been longer than an hour, until i persuaded myself it was a satellite or planet or star, only for it to suddenly move away at 45 degrees in a direction apparently towards the night sky over my head whilst also getting smaller and eventually disappearing - this thing was gaining altitude, and quickly, i say UFO because that's what it was

there's an awful lot of people, surprisingly, many of them Antiloons™ (who think i'm the mad one for not seeing the state as the incompetent fool that it plays but instead as the machinating scheming bunch of cunts it is) who instantly go through the following speciously reasoned unlogic process when they see something in the air they do not understand:

it came from or was in the sky (a) + i don't know what it was (b) x "we don't have anything like that" [i haven't been told that we have anything like that] (c) = "it was space aliens from space in a spacecraft from space" (et)

a+bxc=ET

i have problems with this conclusion, some of the stuff the mic has is so far out there that it's deliberately presented as 'could only have come from space'

i recommend having a look at these videos for context in regard to 'technology that cannot have come from Earth', going back to the Second World War

for more on "flying discs from other worlds" see also: Flying Saucer Aircraft

a chap named Henri Coanda (from whom the Coanda effect gains its name) was working on flying disc shapes before the war

Out of the Blue makes use of many 'disclosure project' types talking a lot of poorly reasoned bullshit, and i mean a lot of nonsense, about how a+bxc=ET - especially when one considers how UFO has completely been converted into meaning something it never expressly defines - there are thousands of UFO sightings from pilots every year - Unidentified Flying Objects is an apt term, but not one that means Undoubtedly From Outerspace, not that you'd ever know it from the way it is used today

it's all components of what i call x-filestianity: the promulgation of belief in alien contact history, especially in tv, such as X-Files, Dark Skies, UFO, Dr Who, Torchwood, and so called 'UFO documentaries' (UFO conflatories), and cinema

check out the second video here of Leo Zagami for what he says about aliens, and fit it into everything you've 'seen' and 'know' of aliens thanks to the media

whoever Leo Zagami is, and even if he's lying, do you honestly think the state, the 'elite', the 'few' - whatever we want to call them - do you really think that they haven't considered the uses that 'alien supermen are our superiors' could be put to ?

if you've seen The Day The Earth Stood Still, you know all you need to know about the threat of alien gods from outer space

the 'alien superiors' thing has been pushed at children for many years now - in programmes such as Wattoo Wattoo, the 'friendly' alien shows it's malevolent side, something it only does one time in the first episode, leaving the threat implicit in children's minds through the whole series and perhaps on through the duration of their entire lives, a subconscious deep rooted fear, remaining unchallenged by the conscious mind

look at kid's tv channels such as nickelodeon's, citv's and children's beebtelescreen outputs, not a jot of aliens in there

in the world of what's supposed to be more grown up fayre, anyone who's seen jim 'mars' marrs or bob 'laser' lazar in action, or seen anything produced by 'the disclosure project', needs to think about what they're being told - with a critical mind, and an ear for specious reason and an eye for disinformation

as for what potential use such alleged 'disclosures' could be put to, think in terms of the broadcast of the radio play The War of the Worlds, or more precisely, the film The Day The Earth Stood Still

another film - made in 1936 - Things To Come, also provides some insight into the kind of use a 'higher power' can be put to, whether it comes from here, or there

and this is where the very much from Earth higher technology fits in to things, whether it's flying saucers, electrogravitic craft, or cullbots, or electrogravitic cullbot aircraft

robot mini tanks featuring high powered weaponry have been field tested in the current declared theatres of the war "against" terror, autonomous robot aircraft - armed robot aircraft - have flown sorties and killed people

you might think that none of this affects you, you might even think 'good, kill the terrorists - they're not civilians', but you probably haven't realised that in this never ending war "against" terror, there is no thin red line, the front line of this perpetual battle is beyond three dimensional, has no borders for skin tone or religion, and it runs through you in several axes

certainly, some of the technology fails, or tries to kill the squaddies who just pressed the 'on' switch, but the intent is there, the intent to no longer risk one person's life in the name of killing another - this is sick, highly fucked up, if there is human evil, beyond the straight up evil of people being sent to kill people - and with high tech/low risk at that, it is the use of entirely manufactured, programmed machines to make war, this is terminator tech, this is the end of the soldier who comes home, breaks down, cries for his sins, and informs us of what is really going on, the awful carnage, the mayhem, it is the end of the soldier who says "i will not fight"

in a world of autonomous cullbots, who's going to tell you it even happened ?

is the cullbot going to lower its weapon and say "no more" ?

i think not


*still some stuff to add: pics and links, stuff on John Frost, panspermia, other things i might remember, etcs


question: why do some b2 crew patches show alien iconography ?

(answer hidden below: select text to view)

because the b2 bomber has a dual propulsion system and can fly electrogravitically

the bloggers from Brazil

.
.
just because a game gets old, tired, doesn't mean people necessarily get bored with playing it

i've observed once or twice, here and there, the appearance of a certain type of keyboard monkey - who posts on websites and blogs whose reason to be is the spreading of the word in regard to the fascism that never really died after World War Two but instead crept unseen into western "democracies" ("democracies" that had been more than a little fascistic in private for many decades running up to the war anyway and no doubt welcomed their brethren into the fold), this fascism is now enjoying a disturbing and increasingly open resurgence - hence my minor obsession with creating various NWOstikas (globalisation and fascism (corporatism), and the "new world order" being synonymous), this is the context in which this particular variety of keyboard monkey is to be found

this type of keyboard monkey will turn up at a place and start debates about to what extent nazi Germany really did murder Jews (and it wasn't solely Jews, it was also dissidents, homosexuals, Romanies, Russian troops by the millions and other groups too), i always found the desire to debate this particular topic curious even if i've never been too curious about the debate itself - nazis were scum, end of, what's to debate ? ...of course it probably goes without saying that in a place where accepted truths - many of which are fabricated consensuses - are brought out into the open and picked at to see where there might be reasons to doubt them, that there will, chances are, be very little that isn't subjected to this scrutiny

but i always found there to be something deeply incongruous about posters in such fora trying to make out the nazis were somehow just misunderstood and really not all that bad

achtung wi-fi zone

today the most common mindset i encounter from any and all people is that there's something up with just about everything going on in the world, people know they inhabit a world where stochasticism simply isn't fit for purpose any more, we live in a world where more and more people get the feeling that living today is almost like living in a world where it was the 'axis' and not the 'allies' who won, a world where death detention camps are real, a world where more and more people are aware of how the (transnational transreligious but not transdimensional) 'elite', through climate change and other blatantly anti-human propaganda, are strongly pushing for depopulation of 'their' world, where war is a means of culling rather than simply killing - it's all so very nazi, and yet these keyboard monkey types turn up clacking desperately at their keyboards, polishing the keys to a fine shine, wearing the lettering off them, furiously trying to make out the nazis were victims of bad PRopaganda

suspicious ?

very

anyone with feelings of sympathy towards fascism, nazism, would find their life easier going and getting a job for the state or some large corporation whilst remaining tight lipped about their fuhrer fantasies: anyone who really loves the ideas of total propaganda, of the state inveigling itself ever more deeply into people's lives, of fomenting fear in their minds of subjects/citizens, of processing children into fascist-jugend, anyone with fantasies about eugenics, a predilection for absolute nihilism, of all the myriad things the nazis were into, would spend their time better and enjoy their existence more, if they were working for the covert nazi asylum, rather than trying to openly evangelise on the internet

if they really were true apologists for fascism, they'd join the closet apologists and implementers of fascism working within the corporatist government-econo-industrial system


from discussions of holocausts, Jews and Judaism it's a short step to Israel...Israel is, in case you hadn't noticed, doing a good impression lately of oppression and murder not so entirely different to that inflicted upon Jews by the nazis, but does that mean that Jews are responsible for the actions of Israel ? hardly, are you responsible for your government murdering a million Iraqis ? we all could have done more to stop the war, to that we must all plead guilty, but ultimately it comes down to the simple fact that 'nations' do not represent their people, 'nations' represent the interests of the 'elite' - that same group who would love to dissolve every 'nation' into their 'new world order', personally i have a difficult time seeing anything coincidental or stochastic in the financial and moral destruction of 'nations', and the plans for one world government

ultimately, although we are all guilty to varying degrees of not being counted, of DO NOTHING™, we are mostly, probably the majority of us in fact, much as the Israeli people are, and the German people were, to some extent the victims of our 'state' too, even if the victims who suffer most are 'the other' or foreign

it's people that make 'nations', and it's people who suffer the consequences of their 'leaders' actions as a 'nation'...i have no particular love for 'nation's - or my own 'nation', with regard to nationalism, xenophobia, and so on - but i do have recognition of the fact that once there is one 'global nation', there'll be nowhere to move to, and no alternative to whatever the fucker in charge dictates ...and i think this is exactly what the greedy fuckers organising this thing know and is one of their reasonings for trying to do it


'big brother' is a possessive sick lover

in case you haven't noticed, things are already a bit crap in terms of dictats: 'big brother', no longer a blurry black and white controversy, has gotten itself its own tv show in crisp high definition with full surround sound - its name is now common parlance which makes it okay, it's gone glossy which makes it fun, and it comes equipped with 'diverting' space hopper boobs, an orange tan and lips that look like night crawlers, it's in your news and monitoring your thoughts and trying to create your thoughts too, it's all around you, filming you, intimidating you, reminding you to both love and fear it, getting you acclimatised to being watched and your life dissected, voted on, judged worthy of continuation...'big brother' is also progressing into the new phase of the war of "against" terror - which, if you hadn't noticed, is a war on Muslims and Islam including the detaining of people without charge for years on end, but will soon, coming to a reality not so much near you as in your fucking face, be a war against you whatever your ethnicity or religious beliefs

some wars are worse than others, but they all have the not often mentioned 'perpetual' aspect to them these days, "do you want totalen krieg, people ?"

new normal - the war on terror is a travelling circus

is total war your "new normal" ?

i know it's not mine

this is an era of war "against" poor education, poverty, drugs, disease, hunger, birds, super annual seasons or cycles, and terror - and that's just the openly declared wars i can think of, let alone the implied war on the majority of humanity itself - face it, war on humanity is, after all, the true implication of all these 'wars "against" stuff', they're concealed declarations of war against you

what most of these openly declared wars appear to share in common with one another is that terror (if you include the terror of war - isn't the war in Iraq, where violence has been used by our 'leaders' to affect political change, an act of terrorism ?), education, poverty, drugs (isn't the opium harvest in Afghanistan at record highs since the invasion ?), hunger and disease are becoming worse not better for having war declared on them - and worse at the hands of the state itself - only the theoretical war on humanity seems to be notching up some victories, surely a mere coincidence ?

open wars these days aren't - so it would seem - supposed to be won, they're supposed to be perpetuated, lost slowly, whilst making incredible amounts of money, allowing the declaratory of said war to gain control over resources, and facilitating the murder lots and lots of people...the war "against" terror fulfils these ambitions and more, it also achieves the handy goal of being a war on dissent

there's been a few people arrested under TERROR !!! laws already for wearing t-shirts with stuff like "bollocks to blair" on them and similar 'atrocities' against our glorious representatives 'leaders' - such as saying out loud that they're murdering bastards - but i think that maybe those coppers had peaked a bit too soon in arresting for such 'outrages' - or, alternatively, it was a not so 'softly softly' way of introducing us all to the notion of 'shut the fuck up' or be arrested for sedition - personally i favour the latter explanation...with the new 'anti' TERROR !!! laws there is now the potential to arrest every damn one of us in this country for possessing entirely innocent household TERRORIST !!! items, or for daring to stock up on items when they're less expensive (ooh, "stockpiling"), we're literally all terrorists now, the clear implied message from the state being DO NOTHING™ and we might just leave you alone, at least for now

much the same as with the law against cannabis (ingesting cannabis, like being willing to criticise your 'government', goes against the idea of obey the state and don't be too thoughtful), the intention is never to incarcerate every offender, but instead to threaten into submission

fundamentalism, radical Islam radicalIsm radicalism - it's not just for "jihadis" ...'radicalism' is going to mean anyone who doesn't remain shutted-the-fuck-up when the government steps out of line and does things you disagree with - remember, it's supposed to represent you


what do nazi apologism and other wacky stuff have to do the 'NWO' ?

funny thing is, that in thinking about this nazi apologism business, it occurred to me that it shares several features with some of the other more whacked out conspirastuff out there - specifically, aliens - as in alleged alien visitations, mutilations, salutations, impregnations, infiltrations, crop decorations, and feared invasions...it also shares something in common with co² climate change propaganda that would have us believe that a) co² is evil and when we produce it it cannot be used by plants as a building block for some reason, and b) that we need to fix the climate at this exact current temperature [and c) that human derived co² climate change is in fact real]

why do i bring this up ? simple: if you can make out the nazis weren't so bad, then people will be less inclined to boo than to salute at their very own schooltrip troopers parade or nuremberg rally (otherwise known as madonna concerts, al gore film showings, and the olympics) some day soon - it's a kind of 'how to look good nazi' makeover or 'pimp my fascism' remodelling

if you can make out the ALIEN THREAT !!! is real, people will be less likely to object to a Deep Impact-esque coke commercial styled 'teach the world to sing' one world government to protect us from those alternate universe evil alien overlord gods from haunted outer space and the future

if you can make out that there's no pollution but co² - 'environmental apologism' in other words - and that we all need to globally synchronise our co² output or we'll cook, then people will beg their 'representatives' to implement a one world government

if you can convince people that the messiah has come, perhaps you can get them to unify globally in a new age of 'enlightenment'

there's more examples, some laughable, some not so, but you get the idea i hope

whilst 'nazis-are-nice' and 'aliens-are-here' do not share one thing in common with 'pardon-me-for-breathing' in that the two former are simultaneously not meant to be credible when it suits current psychological operations against 'truthers' but are also (i think) intended to sow the two constructs into the mind as 'realities', all three (and other similarly useful fears and ideas besides) share the common purposes of 'necessitating' or 'normalising' a fascistic world government

think of the 'NWO' as a puzzle - the people trying to make it happen don't want to show you where all the pieces go too directly, nor do they want to spell out too clearly what the finished product would look like, they want to give you fragments of different puzzles all of which result in the same picture - so, a piece of 'fascism is harmless fun' here, a chunk of asteroid prediction there, a liberal dash of climate change, a generous slosh of "Islamofascism"
'planning to take over the world', xfilestianity all over your tv, war, and many, many more things are all conspiring to make you see only one solution

thing is, that more and more of us are seeing these 'monopolicies' - the solutions given to us by 'superiors', where 'dialogue', 'democracy' and 'engagement' are no such thing, where 'choice' is choosing between the options someone else imposes - for what they are, but those who would control us aren't going to give up without a fight, and not, so it would seem, without playing the 'conspiracist' card

conflation of nazi apologists - or, thanks to the callused hands and fingers of neoTRUTHnazis, simple cut and pasting of online nazi apologism - with 'truth' activism, serves to be extremely useful to those who are, it would seem, waging attempted psychological war against what could be called the not lies movements


off-message ? ...off-mic, off-camera

it's oh so easy in a world where the mainstream media and in particular balanced media are so utterly zugang verboten to anyone who asks the wrong questions or knows the wrong things (well, anyone that isn't fundamentally sabotaged by some messianic, alienic or nazianic or other 'special interest') - and the only broad access means they have to inform others is the internet - for some neoTRUTHnazi to either spill their shit on other people's fora, or pretend association by the use of another group's identity

but then, it is not hard to come to the conclusion that those who utilise these easily conflated denialisms - or quoted denialisms and alienisms of others - and things of their ilk as well as linkages with the intention to discredit are not interested in the truth, but instead serve another master...shape shifting lizard nazis, obviously

The July Seventh Truth Campaign (J7), has recently been the focus of some of these strange folk who seem to be about just causes and yet they have delighted in accusing J7 of being nazi apologists and have engaged in absolutely 'devastating' idiotic taunting because some individual named nick kollerstrom used a web link to J7 as though it was his own site - i'd never heard of him which is strange because i am involved with J7 and have been for quite a while, being involved myself with J7 i would take somewhat personally the attempts to paint us as a bunch of holocaust deniers (amongst the other slurs that have been attempted) if the attempts weren't so utterly pathetic

it doesn't matter how many times mr kollerstrom uses the J7 link, or waves J7's flyers around, J7 is not his website or his campaign any more than holding a big bag of popcorn makes you a maize baron

the people making these accusations and conflations have no idea how many Jewish and Muslim people are or are not involved in J7, which i suspect is why the questions "who are you ?", "who do you know ?" and "what have you done ?" get asked as much as they have been...how 'baffling' it is to be derided as insignificant whilst at the same time being the cause of such fascination and fury

not
.
.

one down (hopefully) but several more to go

picked up from Anon via the excellent Famous For Fifteen Megapixels, and it's worth a shameless cut and paste i'd say:


Climate change confirmed but global warming is cancelled

Owen McShane

Unlike so many of the hapless victims on TVOne's daily Crimewatch (also known as One Network News) I have recently been lucky enough to be in two right places at the right time.

In December last year, at the UN conference in Bali, I heard Viscount Monckton present a paper prepared by himself, the Australian Dr David Evans and our own Dr Vincent Gray (who were at Bali, too) that showed while the IPCC models predict that greenhouse gases would produce an extensive "hot spot" in the upper troposphere over the tropics, the satellite measurements show no such hotspots have appeared.

Monckton and Evans found a large part of this discrepancy is the result of some basic errors in the IPCC's assessment of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. When they applied their revised factor to the effect of greenhouse gases, the temperature rise was about a third of that predicted by the IPCC.

So by late last year we not only knew IPCC forecasts of atmospheric global warming were wrong; we were beginning to understand why they are wrong.

The key issue in this debate is whether anthropogenic greenhouse gases or natural solar activities are the prime drivers of climate change. A closely related argument is whether the climate is highly sensitive to carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere.

Doubtful predictions

Put together, these uncertainties raise doubts as to whether the IPCC models can accurately forecast the climate over the long term. If they cannot, then we have to wonder how much damage we should risk doing to the world's economies in attempts to manage the possibly adverse effects of these "predictions."

The findings that the predicted "tropical hot spots" do not exist are important because the IPCC models assume these hot spots will be formed by increased evaporation from warmer oceans leading to the accumulations of higher concentrations of water vapour in the upper atmosphere, and thereby generating a positive feedback reinforcing the small amount of warming that can be caused by CO2 alone.

Atmospheric scientists generally agree that as carbon dioxide levels increase there is a law of "diminishing returns" - or more properly "diminishing effects" - and that ongoing increases in CO2 concentration do not generate proportional increases in temperature. The common analogy is painting over window glass. The first layers of paint cut out lots of light but subsequent layers have diminishing impact.

So, you might be asking, why the panic? Why does Al Gore talk about temperatures spiraling out of control, causing mass extinctions and catastrophic rises in sea-level, and all his other disastrous outcomes when there is no evidence to support it?

The alarmists argue that increased CO2 leads to more water vapour - the main greenhouse gas - and this provides positive feedback and hence makes the overall climate highly sensitive to small increases in the concentration of CO2.

Consequently, the IPCC argues that while carbon dioxide may well "run out of puff" the consequent evaporation of water vapour provides the positive feedback loop that will make anthropogenic global warming reach dangerous levels.

This assumption that water vapour provides positive feedback lies behind the famous "tipping point," which nourishes Al Gore's dreams of destruction, and indeed all those calls for action now - "before it is too late!" But no climate models predict such a tipping point.

However, while the absence of hot spots has refuted one important aspect of the IPCC models we lack a mechanism that fully explains these supposed outcomes. Hence the IPCC, and its supporters, have been able to ignore this "refutation."

So by the end of last year, we were in a similar situation to the 19th century astronomers, who had figured out that the sun could not be "burning" its fuel - or it would have turned to ashes long ago - but could not explain where the energy was coming from. Then along came Einstein and E=mc2.

Hard to explain

Similarly, the climate sceptics have had to explain why the hotspots are not where they should be - not just challenge the theory with their observations.

This is why I felt so lucky to be in the right place at the right time when I heard Roy Spencer speak at the New York conference on climate change in March. At first I thought this was just another paper setting out observations against the forecasts, further confirming Evans' earlier work.

But as the argument unfolded I realised Spencer was drawing on observations and measurements from the new Aqua satellites to explain the mechanism behind this anomaly between model forecasts and observation. You may have heard that the IPCC models cannot predict clouds and rain with any accuracy. Their models assume water vapour goes up to the troposphere and hangs around to cook us all in a greenhouse future.

However, there is a mechanism at work that "washes out" the water vapour and returns it to the oceans along with the extra CO2 and thus turns the added water vapour into a NEGATIVE feedback mechanism.

The newly discovered mechanism is a combination of clouds and rain (Spencer's mechanism adds to the mechanism earlier identified by Professor Richard Lindzen called the Iris effect).

The IPCC models assumed water vapour formed clouds at high altitudes that lead to further warming. The Aqua satellite observations and Spencer's analysis show water vapour actually forms clouds at low altitudes that lead to cooling.

Furthermore, Spencer shows the extra rain that falls from these clouds cools the underlying oceans, providing a second negative feedback to negate the CO2 warming.

Alarmists' quandary

This has struck the alarmists like a thunderbolt, especially as the lead author of the IPCC chapter on feedback has written to Spencer agreeing that he is right!

There goes the alarmist neighbourhood!

The climate is not highly sensitive to CO2 warming because water vapour is a damper against the warming effect of CO2.

That is why history is full of Ice Ages - where other effects, such as increased reflection from the ice cover, do provide positive feedback - while we do not hear about Heat Ages. The Medieval Warm Period, for example, is known for being benignly warm - not dangerously hot.

We live on a benign planet - except when it occasionally gets damned cold.

While I have done my best to simplify these developments they remain highly technical and many people distrust their own ability to assess competing scientific claims. However, in this case the tipping point theories are based on models that do not include the effects of rain and clouds.

The new Nasa Aqua satellite is the first to measure the effects of clouds and rainfall. Spencer's interpretation of the new data means all previous models and forecasts are obsolete. Would anyone trust long-term forecasts of farm production that were hopeless at forecasting rainfall?

The implications of these breakthroughs in measurement and understanding are dramatic to say the least. The responses will be fun to watch.

Alarmists, 'experts' face a new inconvenient truth

Christopher Pearson, of The Australian newspaper (March 22), has written up a remarkable ABC television interview with Dr Jennifer Marohasy, a senior fellow of the Institute of Public Affairs, a Melbourne-based think tank.

Dr Marohasy says the impact of the Aqua satellite and Spencer's interpretation of the data and prompts the reporter to conclude with some pungent observations of his own:

"If Marohasy is anywhere near right about the impending collapse of the global warming paradigm, life will suddenly become a whole lot more interesting.

"A great many founts of authority, from the Royal Society to the UN, most heads of government along with countless captains of industry, learned professors, commentators and journalists will be profoundly embarrassed. Let us hope it is a prolonged and chastening experience.

"With catastrophe off the agenda, for most people the fog of millennial gloom will lift, at least until attention turns to the prospect of the next ice age. Among the better educated, the sceptical cast of mind that is the basis of empiricism will once again be back in fashion. The delusion that by recycling and catching public transport we can help save the planet will quickly come to be seen for the childish nonsense it was all along.



RAIN CHECK: Spencer's analyses based on new satellite data pour cold rain on warming theory

"The poorest Indians and Chinese will be left in peace to work their way toward prosperity, without being badgered about the size of their carbon-footprint, a concept that for most of us will soon be one with Nineveh and Tyre, clean forgotten in six months.

"The scores of town planners in Australia building empires out of regulating what can and can't be built on low-lying shorelines will have to come to terms with the fact inundation no longer impends and find something more plausible to do. The same is true of the bureaucrats planning to accommodate 'climate refugees."

7-Apr-2008

Source

fluoride ? you must want to be sick

.
.

.
picked up at the Conspiraloon HyperNode™
.

.
.

gonzo terror

gonzo terrorists - gonzo terror - "it never sets fear enough for we"


Gonzo Terrorism describes the act of being intricately involved in terrorism - often actually initiating it and managing and steering its progress, and then blaming 'the other'. Gonzo Terror is sometimes real, sometimes imagined, and commonly not what it appears to be.

Gonzo Terrorism¹ is a type of state-terrorism involving the spook as integral to the plot.

The use of Gonzo Terrorism implies the close involvement of the security services in the very insecurity they are tasked with tackling. Through the utilisation of unknowing or entrapped individuals, threats, and hostages, the security services contrive acts of 'terror' to sow division, mistrust, fear, uncertainty, and doubt. (This is related to false flag 'terror': the act of state, racist and extreme groups instigating acts of 'terror' in the name of their sworn enemies.)

Gonzo Terrorism² is a style of journo-terrorism which is written subjectively, often including the reporter as part of the story via a first person narrative. The style tends to blend misrepresentative and fictional elements to emphasize an underlying message and engage the reader.

Gonzo Terrorism tends to favour style over accuracy and often uses personal experiences and emotions to provide context for the topic or event being covered. It is exemplified by the fabricated product favoured by newspaper and television media and strives for the gritty fantasy fear factor. Use of selective quotes, outright lies, exaggeration, and even racism is common. The use of Gonzo Terrorism portends that journalism is increasingly untruthful and without objectivity and is rarely if ever equivalent to reality.

milkshake messiah

Lyrics at The Conspiraloon Moon Monkey® Headquarters

Hey Kids ! join the cool end times party at Conspiraloonery Central™